Visual
Light, movement, patterns.
A structured psychoeducational analysis of the 7 sensory systems based on consolidated models and scientific literature on sensory processing, including the framework of Winnie Dunn, expanded with interoception literature (Garfinkel & Critchley), sensory masking (Hull et al.) and processing in autism (Bogdashina, Schaaf & Lane).
Designed for autistic and other neurodivergent people (ADHD, high abilities, dyspraxia, hyperlexia…), families and professionals seeking a clear, applicable reading of sensory functioning.
It's understanding why you become saturated in certain environments, why you avoid certain sensations, or why you need specific stimuli to regulate yourself.
This report lets you see
Not everything is psychological.
Often, it's sensory.
The report relies on consolidated sensory processing models and contemporary scientific literature:
Base framework with the four patterns: sensitivity, avoidance, seeking and low registration.
Adds experiential depth on hypersensitivity, hyposensitivity, distortion and overload in autism.
Classic foundation on how the nervous system organizes sensory input and its impact on behavior.
Current research on internal-signal perception, interoceptive accuracy and its relation to emotion.
Contemporary model of the masking effort and its invisible cost. Allows estimating the gap between visible load and real load (ICM/ICE).
Ben-Sasson et al. (2009), Robertson & Baron-Cohen (2017), Schaaf & Lane (2015) as a contemporary evidence base.
Proprietary integration of the previous frameworks into four quantifiable clinical indices: Sensory Friction, Regulation, Masking and Effective Load.
All of it integrated into a single interpretation system that translates your answers into understandable, actionable patterns.
Your answers aren't just shown as is. They are organized through a structured interpretation method.
The goal isn't to label you,
but to make your experience legible.
Built upon established scientific frameworks, the PsicoCódice model integrates sensory processing, interoception, sensory masking and recovery dynamics into a unified interpretive system.
Its purpose is not to assign diagnoses, but to make sensory experiences easier to understand, identify recurring patterns and support more informed environmental and self-regulation decisions. The Sensory Friction Index (IFS) is the first of those pieces, on a 0–100 scale.
Level of stimulus interference with activity.
Effort to appear regulated despite the load.
Time and cost to return to baseline.
Real impact combining friction, masking and recovery.
Pattern when high friction, high masking and slow recovery converge.
The IFS is obtained from four components rated 0 to 10. They are combined through a fixed weighting to produce a final 0–100 scale.
The model also incorporates masking (ICM) and recovery (IRS), allowing the estimation of effective load (ICE) across different contexts.
Perceived magnitude of the sensory input. This dimension is the classic one collected by the Dunn (Sensory Profile) and SPM-2 frameworks. It appears across the literature on sensory thresholds.
Degree to which the stimulus appears without anticipation. Included because studies on allostatic load and autism show that unpredictable stimuli cost more resources than strong but anticipated ones.
Interference with the ongoing task or activity. Measured separately from intensity because two people may perceive a stimulus as equally strong but only one of them sees their activity interrupted.
Time and cost to return to baseline after exposure. Captures the dimension least represented in classic instruments: what happens after the stimulus, not only during it.
ICE is not magic. It combines the three previous dimensions and modulates the result by the recovery cost.
where IFS provides the main weight, ICM raises the load when active masking is present (because it consumes additional energy), and IRS modulates upward when recovery is slow. The specific weighting formula is documented in the model technical notebook and can be requested by email.
ICE is an interpretive indicator, not a diagnostic measure.
A single person may score differently depending on the moment. Literature on allostatic load, autistic fatigue and burnout shows that the sensory profile fluctuates with physiological and contextual state.
We therefore recommend repeating the analysis at different moments if you intend to make important decisions based on it.
Fewer hours and poorer quality reduce sensory tolerance the next day.
Long stretches of tension reduce the margin against everyday stimuli.
Different phases of the menstrual cycle can modify sensory reactivity.
Active episodes or prodromes amplify multisensory sensitivity.
After long periods of over-demand, friction increases and recovery takes longer.
Space, lighting, acoustic density and temperature change the real load.
The IVS detects a specific pattern; it does not predict a crisis. It identifies profiles where four conditions converge simultaneously:
When these four conditions converge, the literature describes a higher likelihood of sensory overload episodes (which some people call meltdown or shutdown depending on the expressive direction).
The IVS does not diagnose meltdown or shutdown. It does not predict any individual episode. It is a statistical-clinical pattern that invites reducing load preventively.
The PsicoCódice model is grounded on consolidated frameworks and recent reviews:
Inspired by consolidated sensory processing frameworks (Dunn, SPM-2), incorporating dimensions less represented in those instruments:
This psychoeducational tool helps identify in which situations sensory overload may appear and which adjustments can reduce it.
It is not a clinical diagnosis or an official psychological evaluation.
Score and interpretation of each sensory channel.
Friction, Masking, Recovery, Effective load and Overload vulnerability.
How your system behaves at work, home, social, transport and sleep.
Concrete, actionable strategies according to your pattern.
1 page with QR code to share with a professional or keep with you.
Adaptable to school, high-school, work or family. Explains what you need and why.
Both formats included. Selectable text, ideal for printing.
“We observe a high auditory sensitivity alongside a low tendency to sensory seeking. This may explain avoidance of noisy environments without the appearance of active regulation strategies.”
The model integrates systems that are rarely looked at together. Here they appear on a single map.
Light, movement, patterns.
Sound, volume, frequency.
Touch, texture, temperature.
Balance, movement.
Body, force, posture.
Tastes and smells.
Internal signals.
Four steps, with no unnecessary registrations or superfluous friction.
Access through a one-time payment from PsicoCódice.com.
You receive your access within 24h.
100 items organized into 5 blocks: sensory, habits, ecological contexts, masking and differentials. 25–40 minutes, at your own pace.
Immediate download of the result as PDF.
To understand and adjust their environment.
To better understand certain behaviors.
As supporting material for analysis.
A psychoeducational analysis tool for the sensory profile that helps understand patterns and make better-adjusted decisions in daily life.
This analysis is a psychoeducational tool that organises information about your sensory profile. It can help you understand your responses to the environment, but it does not replace a complete professional assessment when clinical, legal or forensic use is required.
What people about to do this actually ask themselves. No jargon, no detours.
One single payment. One code. One clear report.
If you need a report with legal or forensic validity, PsicoCódice offers complete psychological evaluations performed by qualified professionals, adapted to judicial and administrative contexts in Spain.
Request information